🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the archives is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.